Who Am I? What Am I?

 

«Man is not man unless he is a traveler, creating his own space at every moment and at every point of his journey.»

 

This is the space created by our path – the only space in which we live – is the land of our soul; it is our homeland. We have no other. And any other space is the place upon which we project the space of our passage. We preferred to build our soul space in the USA, in Oregon. This is the space of our homeland, and it is shaped by our thinking; without it, there are no forests, no lakes, and no mountains here, which we breathe – there is no us ourselves.

 

Just look at how it happens! We took one step, and right here our space appeared. We took a second step, and our space appeared again. And this happens after every step we take. This is how our world of psychoanalysts and dream interpreters is built.

 

Furthermore, the world of psychoanalysts and dream interpreters is built vertically. It was the ancient indigenous peoples and the indigenous Finno-Ugric peoples who knew that a middle-level man can barely say two words most of the time. And so they taught the higher language of the highest level to express their thoughts; they taught the vertical path. And then, having mastered this language, the average man could establish a vertical hierarchy of his thinking, and this hierarchy always originates from the top. Just as any analysis or interpretation of dreams cannot be average. It can only be the best – and therefore vertical. The ancient indigenous peoples spoke of the intention of pure vertical action in this way: «Do what you wish, but do the very best.» This is pure action, pure thinking. Everything we do must be the very best of the very best that we are capable of.

 

The text you will read below is a prompt for every man on how he can determine his readiness for an authentic psychoanalytic path. Here you will find no persuasion, no seduction, no holding on – and certainly no promises. We are interested in the courage to choose the difficult, clean, and sincere path of man who loves his life, loves his family, wants to build a beautiful future, and is ready to put things in order in the secret rooms of his narcissistic core. Why does man do this, you may ask? We will answer: because he wants to.

 

Therefore, first of all, determine for yourself whether you are ready to take this uneasy, difficult, but clean and sincere path out of «Oedipal idiocy» in the existential, and not literal sense, and only after that toward the meeting with that kind, and beautiful, which truly exists within you. And allow us to tell of what we saw in the Oedipal forests of narcissism and to do it as well as we are only capable of doing it.

 

The most grateful people who turn to psychoanalysis for help are young people who have not yet managed to build their families. These are people who do not yet have a husband or a wife, do not have a built system of mutual destructions, do not have a many-year layer of claims, manipulations, revenge, betrayal, gossip, set-ups, envy and accumulated hatred. The «crime» has not yet happened. Young people have not yet had time to poison the life of a close one for years, have not yet had time to pull a spouse into a grave illness of relationships, have not yet had time to reprogram the other for their fears, benefits and narcissistic demands. If they are not yet married, if they are only preparing for close relationships, they have more chances left to carefully work through their narcissistic core, to see their own aggression, envy, inclination toward destruction, need for a set-up, gossip, moral superiority and inner cynicism. The earlier man sees the destroyer in oneself, the more chances he has to renounce justified violence.

 

Most often, however, already adult men and women turn for help. And if looking at the external side of their requests, it seems that they come with ordinary troubles of man: divorce, betrayal, the death of a husband or a wife, the illness of a spouse, the illness or death of a child, one’s own illness, a multitude of symptoms, a feeling of guilt, fear, loneliness, confusion, tiredness from family life, the impossibility of making a decision. But behind these formulations something else is often hidden – the psychologist or psychoanalyst in such cases is often initially planned to be used. If one of the spouses has already died, if a spouse has become seriously ill, if a child has found himself in trouble, if some tragedy has already happened in the family, then the psychologist becomes the one who must forgive a man his guilt: guilt for destruction, for illness, for symbolic or factual participation in the destruction of the close one.

 

And if the tragedy has not yet happened, then the psychologist may be unconsciously or even quite consciously used as the one who must give permission for a future destructive act, that is, for a «crime». For example, permission to leave a husband in such a way as not to feel responsibility for the collapse of the marriage, especially if there are small children in the marriage. Or permission to cheat on a spouse in such a way that it would look like liberation and deserved freedom, to which, in the opinion of the one cheating, there is a right. Or permission to destroy the relationship in such a way that it would be called caring for oneself. Or permission to bring a spouse to illness, to the symbolic or literal, and at the same time with the feeling: «There is no guilt of mine in this».

 

That is why many people go not only to psychologists, but also to modern priests: they need someone to remove guilt from them. Although in religious spaces this is harder to do, because in any serious spiritual tradition there exists a prohibition on murder, causing harm, envy, betrayal, set-up, pride, aggression and destruction of one’s neighbor. Therefore much more convenient turns out to be the space of modern psychology, especially that part of it which has long turned into a corrupt sphere of services, emotional stroking and justification of any immoral mask for a certain cost.

 

There are two psychologies as paths: the first path – this is the horizontal psychology of the persona, the psychology of the mask. Into it comes not man, but a role: the role of a victim, an offended wife, a suffering husband, an unjustly humiliated child, a tired mother, a betrayed spouse, a man who gave his whole life to the family, or a man whom allegedly no one comprehends and hears, a scapegoat, a great martyr. On this path is presented a market of specialists in the remission of sins. Here all scenarios are written out in advance and everyone knows his role.

 

For example, a woman complains about her husband. The psychologist agrees with the woman, she pays for these confirmations. With each session the psychologist receives more and more one-sided information about how terrible, cruel, evil, unbearable an abuser the husband of the client’s mask is. And gradually the psychologist begins to verbally confirm to this mask: yes, you are right, he really is bad; yes, you need to leave him; yes, you are guilty of nothing; yes, he deserves punishment, illness, expulsion from your life.

 

And the client’s mask actually comes with a certain task from the beginning: to gather as many witnesses as possible. The more witnesses confirm that her husband hurts her, the more she has the right to leave and at the same time destroy, accuse, file a lawsuit, publicly humiliate, take revenge. At the same time she will not act as a man who truly needs help. She will act as a man who needs justification.

 

Danger and accusation – these are different things.

 

If a man is in real danger, one first of all runs from danger. One does not gather evidence for years, does not accumulate material, does not create an archive of accusations, does not turn the psychologist into a notary of one's rightness. One saves oneself. Of course, there are complex situations of physical holding, medication dependence, financial unfreedom, because of which leaving immediately is impossible. But over a certain time, for example a year, it is already possible to realize that life is in danger and a normal man, even extremely unsure of oneself and psychologically broken, will do everything to get out. At least instinctively.

 

If a woman or a man continues to live in unbearable, as they call them, relationships and at the same time is occupied not with leaving the relationships, but with accumulating accusatory material, this may say that one has gone not by the path of salvation, but by the path of realizing one's own anger, aggression and revenge even at such a price. These are fundamentally different things: to leave real danger or to remain next to the object of hatred, calling it dangerous. At the same time accumulating evidence that the partner is an abuser, setting oneself up under a planned blow for the further taking of new testimony, asserting that this was unexpected.

 

It is exactly here that the psychologist must be especially attentive. One must not become the advocate of the mask. One must see: who is before one? A man who wants to live and be happy or a man who seeks permission for a crime? This can be comprehended only thanks to dreams. But about this a little later.

 

If a man, with the help of a psychologist, received the desired justification, committed a destructive act, betrayed, left, accused, destroyed the relationship, achieved moral permission for his action, then the relief will still be short-lived. After some time guilt returns and begins to press, overwhelm, alarm with new force. And then a man goes to look for a new psychologist. Thus arises an endless circle: the mask comes, receives confirmation, commits an action, experiences temporary relief, again falls into guilt and again looks for a specialist who will confirm that one is guilty of nothing.

 

Also on the first path a family couple often uses the psychologist as a third, whom afterward can be accused, in order to unite with each other again. In such a case manipulations can be primitive, low-level, but at the same time sufficiently effective. For example, a wife comes to a psychologist and complains about her husband. If in the relationship there really is violence or humiliation, a good psychologist will help the woman to stand on her feet, to return the feeling of strength and faith in herself. Then, being more confident in herself, the woman informs her husband that she is leaving. And here the husband outside the therapeutic office begins to promise important things: he will change, he has realized everything, he will no longer do so, the family must be preserved, changes his behavior, makes long-awaited gifts. The woman, especially if she is financially dependent, if she has children, if she is materially dependent, most often had as the true goal of visiting sessions the provocation of the husband into desired actions. And having reached the goal, the psychologist will be utilized as an unnecessary object. And in order for the utilization to be quite justified, the psychologist must be accused of something by both of the couple. For this all conditions and arguments will be secretly prepared.

 

Having united in the accusation of the psychologist, such a family couple can hold out together for some more time. In this sense the psychologist becomes consumable material of the family couple. He is invited for subsequent expulsion for the purposes of the only way to unite, even if for a short time. The couple as if «brings the psychologist as a sacrifice», in order to restore its own shaky unity for some time. And shaky it in fact is, because these people have a common business, and the division of the business in divorce will lead to loss of money. And also they created a family not by love. And living with each other has long ago become unbearable for them. But money decides everything for such people.

 

There is also another scenario on the first path, when so-called clients find a psychologist or psychoanalyst who has at least primitive knowledge, and come to one not in order to change, but in order to learn to manipulate. Such clients learn to speak, build dialogue, use psychological constructions, choose words, realize weak spots, create the appearance of awareness. Then they return home and apply this knowledge against close ones: more elegantly set up, more sophisticatedly accuse, more competently insult, more carefully lie, more deftly wrap around the one with whom they live, using the new lexicon. The psychological session becomes a place where one learns not truth, but more skillful lie. Besides, coming from the session, one tells one's spouse on behalf of the psychologist not what was in fact, and distorts phrases so that it would be beneficial to oneself.

 

The very nature of buying and selling, into which modern psychology of the first path has in many ways turned, creates a dangerous situation. The psychologist receives money, and the client receives the «right» to do anything whatever with the psychologist: manipulate, lie, seduce, devalue, use, accuse. Psychoanalysis on this path is business.

 

Besides, the psychologists of the first path set themselves up from the first seconds of going out onto the stage of the market – they look not like people having relation to thought, morality, analytical strictness and inner culture, but like figures trading themselves, their body, their sexuality, and in the most vulgar way. Women, calling themselves psychologists, not infrequently choose an extremely vulgar external appearance: short skirts, deep necklines, provocative poses, demonstrative corporeality, absence of etiquette, absence of restraint, absence of that form which generally must be in man working with the soul. Men-psychologists place their bet on demonstrative masculinity, on the image of a «male», on the demonstration of women around themselves, on the themes of sexuality, mistresses, libido, orgasm, money, gifts, apartments, cars, power over a man or a woman. The most sold themes of this path are connected not with thinking, not with morality, not with responsibility, not with overcoming one’s own narcissism, but with how to get benefit, how to seduce, how to return, how to force to give, how to punish an abuser, how to make it so that another man would provide, give gifts, want, suffer, depend.

 

Looking at the corrupt psychologist, the client instantly reads: before him is that very low-caliber idiot who has worked through almost nothing in himself. Has not cultivated morality, uses sexuality for manipulation, glorifies greed, envy, vanity, the need to be liked, the desire to sell oneself, the desire to be chosen, the desire to please the crowd. And then the client realizes: with this psychologist it will be easy. With this psychologist it will be easy to justify betrayal. With this psychologist it will be easy to learn to lie to a husband or a wife. With this psychologist it will be easy to find permission for betrayal. With this psychologist it will be easy to make out of one’s own lust «search for oneself». With this psychologist it will be easy to call the destruction of the family liberation. With this psychologist it will be easy to abandon a child and call this care for personal boundaries. With this psychologist it will be easy to use other people and call this maturity. With this psychologist it will be easy to turn a crime against one’s neighbor into a beautiful psychological formulation, for example «accident», «chance», «fate’s doom» or simply illness.

 

On the second path, however, a competent psychoanalyst realizes that psychoanalysis and the interpretation of dreams cannot be bought or sold. A true psychoanalyst is occupied not with stroking a mask, but with cleaning out the narcissistic core and cultivating morality in the living man who turned for help. Morality – this is the place where the law is born: one must not kill, one must not destroy, one must not make another sick with one’s hatred, one must not betray, set up, gossip, one must not endlessly use another man as the object of one's malice and dissatisfaction. It is necessary to come to agreements. It is necessary to look truth in the face. It is necessary to realize what you actually want. And here the real work begins. Instead of accusing the husband, wife, parents, society, politicians, presidents, aliens, etc. the analyst helps man ask himself a question: did I myself create this in my life? Man must see that the marriage was created not by love and this marriage was created by him himself. That children were born not in love, and he gave birth to the children himself. That the relationships are built on material benefit, fear, dependence, emptiness, desire for status, sadism, masochism and complicity in a «crime» in relation to a third, and he saw what he was choosing. That now a man has «seven on the benches», and he does not love them and even more – he hates them and secretly wishes them death and this hatred is his personal one. That half of life has passed, and he still has not created his own support.

 

Real analytical labor, this is a very difficult process. It is not for the faint of heart. Man comes to this path not in order to hear how wonderful he is, but in order to meet his shadow.

 

It is necessary to look for those specialists who have their own life, their own affairs, their own professional form, their own family, living and healthy close relationships, living and healthy children, spouses. It is necessary to look for people who do not sell themselves, but labor. Do not seduce the audience, but think, keep their morality clean and carefully guard it.

 

At one time we were engaged in the search for analysts and philosophers who had happy relationships of man in families. This is that research of which we are very proud. We studied an enormous number of fates and built magnificent constructions, and in our list of such couples there are already 56. This is enormous wealth. We wholeheartedly wish every thinking man to be interested in and know family couples who live happily. Begin your own research in this theme. We assure you, a wonderful report will come out, interesting to many people.

 

Thus we see two paths: the first – this is the psychology of masks, the psychology of personas, the psychology of those inner «devils» who govern the narcissistic core and want to become «lords of the rings of fate»: to rule, seduce, accuse, receive, destroy, justify themselves, manipulate. This is the road of self-selling, the road of the sexual showcase, the road of clickable themes.

 

The second path – true psychoanalysis, where the clearing of narcissism, the cultivation of morality and the return of spirituality to man take place.

 

On the first path any narcissistic mask becomes a more skillful mask, and man still does not self-determine. On the second path the living man self-determines and creates his thought-activity space and does this because he very much wants it!

 

But without dreams nowhere.

 

The average non-thinking man never allows access to his narcissism. He wishes to look wonderful in the eyes of others. However much the psychologist may try to get to the dark places of the narcissistic core, consciously no mask will let him there. Inner objects – masks, will resist, defend themselves, lead the conversation away, substitute themes, build justifications and suddenly become ill or be late to meetings. That is why without dreams nowhere.

 

The dream is a message that breaks through the barrier of censorship. Only the dream opens the hidden. At the moment of dreaming the inner guard, critic, censor sleeps. The material of the dream penetrates into consciousness instantly and thus a man brings the dream in the basket of his memory. When a competent analyst skillfully interprets the dream, there appears the possibility to immediately get into the narcissistic core. For the mask this is unpleasant, frightening, unbearable for mask self-love. But it is precisely in the dream that the material lies about what bad act man committed.

 

It is important to realize: a bad act is bad not only because it caused harm to another man or to you yourself. It is bad because it worsened everything. «Everything» – this is all the labor that a man did not do in one's life. From this realization begins the most important. Speaking of the thickets of the narcissistic core, we want to note that we, in no measure, are followers of George Ivanovich Gurdjieff. We simply love him very much. And precisely now, as the simplest metaphor for realizing what the space of narcissism represents, we recall the classification of George Ivanovich, devoted to idiotism in the ontological, and not literal sense.

 

The most primitive level of idiotism – objective idiotism. People suffering from this kind of idiotism, in the opinion of George Ivanovich, are about 90 percent of the population. For such people someone else thinks, since with such idiotism there is «no one in the little house». Therefore with such people anything can be done. They are the tool, they are the hammer, they are the shovel. They inevitably turn out to be an instrument, as George Ivanovich loved to say, in the hands of the devil. Because the devil, in the opinion of George Ivanovich, cannot live without such people. This is the environment of the devil. In it live not great sinners, but ordinary objective idiots. The next level of idiotism – subjective idiotism, in which people have reached the awareness of their objective idiotism. And therefore they begin to think subjectively. What is this that comes out, they think? I turned myself into a shovel. But a shovel exists in order to rake grain with it or dig earth. Into what have I turned myself? That is, in the process of the movement of the subjective idiot according to George Ivanovich, some very important transformations occur not only in the thinking of man, but also in his thinking of the world around him.

 

 

And, finally, the third stage of subjective idiotism, at which people come to the awareness that their consciousness also has some objective meaning, that it is, if you wish, a level of the universe. And that in some sense they, as they feel themselves, are included in this consciousness. That is, that each of their thoughts, that each of their words, each of their dreams, each of their decisions and movements has meaning.

 

After such realization in competent analysis begins an important stage of labor on «one’s own idiotism». Man must first become aware of himself as an objective idiot. Not in the everyday insulting sense, but in the exact existential sense: as a creature that does not think, does not answer, does not see consequences, lives by reactions, accuses others, schemes, destroys and at the same time wants to look good and humiliates or laughs at his dreams.

 

«Idiots» inevitably create for themselves protection, an environment, surroundings corresponding to their thinking level. It is important to comprehend: not this environment in itself creates idiotism. Rather the opposite: since idiotism already exists, it begins to look for that which corresponds to it. Therefore it can be said: music for idiots, cinema for idiots, plays for idiots, social networks for idiots, psychologists for idiots, family systems for idiots. But more precisely it will be to say otherwise: idiotism itself gives birth to the need for objects of the lowest type. As thinking of the middle or highest level needs its objects, so too thinking of the lowest level needs objects that will serve it, confirm it, entertain it, justify it and guard it.

 

Departure from idiotism in the form of an inner life shift – this is the gradual transformation of consciousness into that which itself begins to generate other objects for itself. Man ceases to depend on a low environment. Man ceases to feed on other’s vulgarity, other’s aggression, other’s explanations. He begins to create his own objects of thinking: questions, texts, affairs, forms, relationships, studies, analytical constructions, moral decisions and, of course, careful analysis of dreams. First the path of thinking must change. First man must try to think himself and his life in another, new way.

 

If man simply recognizes himself as a complete or objective idiot, he may get stuck on this. He may begin to wear this recognition as a new mask: «I realized everything, it reached me, I am an idiot», but at the same time change nothing. Therefore one recognition is little. It is necessary, having recognized oneself as an «objective idiot», right away to begin looking for some thinking moves and to act. It is necessary to begin thinking differently. It is necessary to turn one’s own catastrophe, one’s own stupidity, one’s own destroyed life not into a reason for another self-justification and long melancholy on the shores of a depressive ocean, but into an object of thinking of a higher level.

 

In this sense the example of our beloved philosopher Alexander Moiseyevich Piatigorsky is very precise. He told a story from his life, when he found himself in a difficult position, practically homeless. One of his friends tried to interest a rich acquaintance in him, who had many apartments and houses in London. The friend cautiously asked whether he could allow Piatigorsky to live in one of the vacant apartments, which had not yet been rented out, not sold and not used. The answer was categorical: no. And the explanation was cruel – this man is not a good Jew, because a good Jew would not have found himself in such a position. Therefore, he is a bad Jew and, perhaps, a bad man, whom God is justly punishing. Piatigorsky’s first reaction was that very vulgar reaction of an objective idiot. He reacted with anger, offense, crude contempt toward this man. That is, at first the ordinary reaction of offended narcissism worked: «how dare he?», «a greedy man also moralizes», «he is bad, he is guilty, he should have helped». But then the main thing happened. Walking home, Piatigorsky began to think. He suddenly saw that this unpleasant, cruel, offensive refusal could help him return to another angle of view. He asked himself a question: who produced my state of homelessness and catastrophe? And the answer was no longer about that rich man, not about circumstances, the injustice of the world. The answer was: I myself. I myself, with my way of thinking, empty hope, immaturity, infantility, prepared this situation for myself. After this answer, Piatigorsky very quickly built the career that a normal genius should have. The English adored him and at his lectures there was always a full house.

 

And this is already the beginning of analysis – the ability to take even a humiliating, painful, outwardly unjust situation and make it an object of thinking. Even an idiotic, low, heavy reality can be used as material for thinking of a higher level. But for this it is necessary first to reflect oneself as a «complete idiot». And when man truly does this, other objects begin to appear for him, another angle of view and, gradually, another life.

 

Psychoanalysis in itself is life. Life has meaning only when there is in it that which changes man. If man lives and does not change the angle of view, if he only repeats his reactions, accuses, justifies himself, defends the mask, he does not live for real.

 

Well then, the path of growing up can be expressed in three words: become, do, share.

 

First man must become. That is, acquire one’s own form, one’s own thinking, one’s own moral vertical, the ability to answer for oneself. Then one must do. Not fantasize about oneself, not tell what one could be like or eternally wait for ideal conditions, but really create one's own and now: an affair, a thought, a form, a text, notes, relationships, labor, practice, a piece, a home, the space of his soul. And only after this can one share. Because one can share only that which is truly created. One cannot share emptiness, complaint, envy and other's words. One can share only that which has passed through the labor of one’s own life.

 

Become. Do. Share. This is the exit from idiotism toward one’s own worldview, toward the mature individuality. When man becomes mature, his thinking begins to generate new inner objects: beautiful, moral, living. And only these new objects can gradually eclipse, muffle, recycle those inner objects that were implanted by parents through their own idiotism, pain, fear, aggression and immaturity. Then old wounds cease to show through and hurt. The thinking of an idiot corresponds to the needs of an idiot. It looks for benefit, justification, the guilty one, a loophole, a witness, an accomplice, an alibi. The thinking of man who knows who he is and what he is corresponds to the needs of living man, who has a living soul. It looks for truth, labor, affair, meaning, responsibility, love, creation. From such man one cannot hear accusations in anyone’s direction. He is occupied with his own affairs.

 

A mature living man rejoices in that which will be more difficult. He loves difficulty because he realizes: it is precisely through difficulty that he grows. He gets up earlier, does more, studies, creates, helps. He loves to go to bed tired. He wakes up at 6 in the morning not because he has fully slept, but because there is an affair which he serves. For immature man this is violence. For mature man this is true happiness.

 

And here is something else: a competent analyst must be a very strong and brave man. Especially when the interpretation of dreams of a man who has just come into analysis begins, first of all the vulgar reaction of the «objective idiot» manifests. The vulgar reaction always looks unattractive. This is most often offense, aggression, accusation, mockery, hysteria, the desire to run away, the desire to humiliate the analyst, the desire to prove that the analyst understood nothing, scandalousness, insults. That which the analyst has to see cannot be pleasant, but precisely in this reaction the material begins to manifest for the man himself. And the task of the analyst – not to be frightened, not to take offense, not to begin defending himself, not to become a participant in a primitive fight, but to hold the question: What has manifested now? Who is speaking now? Who demands justification? Who wants to be innocent? Who hates? Who wants to be pitied and freed from responsibility? Who are you?

 

Certainly, in order to withstand with dignity the vulgar reactions of the «objective idiot», a competent analyst must love his own life, his family, his relationships, his thinking. And know that life has no price. And have the freedom at any moment to refuse interaction with the mask, if the vulgar reaction has crossed all permissible boundaries.

 

One of the important tasks before the beginning of one’s analysis becomes the practice of isolation from everything idiotic and from that which feeds idiotism. It is necessary to remove all social networks. Remove bloggers «idiots». Remove the informational «idiotic swamp», which creates the illusion of life, but in fact only supports inner scatteredness. It is necessary to begin listening to people who truly love to think. For this are needed the right philosophers, the right thinkers, serious books, deep texts, a real intellectual environment. A competent analyst must be able to suggest whom to turn to, what to read, what to listen to, around which thoughts to build one’s inner space. Man must literally lay around himself thinking new to him.

 

And here it is again important to return to Piatigorsky. He said that everything depends on how you think yourself as man who thinks about his own life, about catastrophes, about violence, about guilt, about destruction, about happiness, about love. Man becomes a historical analyst of himself, even if only for a short time, when he does not simply reason about events, but meditates on historical objects and on his own way of comprehending them. And this has a direct relation to psychoanalysis. Because man must comprehend not only how he found himself in his private catastrophe, but also how his thinking participates in broader forms of destruction. How must one think in order to commit a destructive act? How must one think in order to betray? How must one think in order to kill? How must one think in order to find oneself in the position of the one being destroyed? How must one think in order to become a participant in a family, social, political, spiritual or historical crime? These are very difficult questions.

 

Therefore the analysis of man is the analysis of his way of thinking. It is precisely the way of thinking that determines actions, the close environment and choices. Man must see: I do not simply suffer. I produced that which I call my fate. I created this by my way of thinking, by my refusals to think, by my benefits, by my envy, by my fear, by my narcissism, by my hatred, by my weakness, by my desire to have an alibi, by my slipperiness. True psychoanalysis is a living meeting with that from which man has been running all his life: with his aggression, envy, lie, weakness, benefit, betrayal, destruction and unwillingness to think.

 

And now it is the very time to look into the roadmap of rules of our scientific community. Below you will see the charter of the scientific community, a public notice of the opening, as well as of what the laboratory of dream science, psychoanalysis and the living transmission of knowledge of the Veps indigenous tribal people of the Laksha clan is.